Penn physicists help show math behind growth of 'coffee rings'
![]() |
Felice Macera, University of Pennsylvania |
Last
year, a team of University of Pennsylvania physicists showed how to undo the
"coffee-ring effect," a commonplace occurrence when drops of liquid
with suspended particles dry, leaving a ring-shaped stain at the drop's edges.
Now the team is exploring how those particles stack up as they reach the drop's
edge, and they discovered that different particles make smoother or rougher
deposition profiles at the drop edge depending on their shape. These resultant
growth profiles offer tests of deep mathematical ideas about growing interfaces
and are potentially relevant for many commercial and industrial coating
applications.
The new
research was conducted by the members of the original team: professor Arjun
Yodh, director of the Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter; doctoral
candidates Peter Yunker and Matthew Lohr; and postdoctoral fellow Tim Still,
all of the Department of Physics and Astronomy in Penn's School of Arts and
Sciences. New to the collaboration were professor D.J. Durian of the Department
of Physics and Astronomy and Alexei Borodin, professor of mathematics at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Their study was published in the journal Physical Review Letters.
In the
"coffee-ring effect," drop edges are "pinned" to a surface,
meaning that when the liquid evaporates, the drop can't shrink in circumference
and particles are convectively pushed to its edges. The Penn team's earlier
research showed that this phenomenon was highly dependent on particle shape.
Spherical particles could flow under or over each other to aggregate on the
edges, but ellipsoidal particles formed loosely packed logjams as they
interacted with one another on the surface of the drop.
MIT's
Borodin saw the Penn team's earlier experimental videos online, and they
reminded him of analytical and simulation work he and others in the math
community had performed on interfacial growth processes. These problems had
some similarity to the random-walker problem, a classic example in probability
theory that involves tracing the path of an object that randomly picks a
direction each time it takes a step. In the present case, however, the random
motion involved the shape of a surface: the edge of the drop where new
particles are added to the system. Borodin was curious about these growth processes
in drying drops, especially whether particle shape had any effect.
"Interfacial
growth processes are ubiquitous in nature and industry, ranging from vapor
deposition coatings to growing bacterial colonies, but not all growth processes
are the same," Yunker said. "Theorists have identified several
qualitatively distinct classes of these processes, but these predictions have
proven difficult to test experimentally."
The two
classes of particular interest are "Poisson" and
"Kardar-Parisi-Zhang" processes. Poisson processes arise when growth
is random in space and time; in the context of an interfacial growth process,
the growth of one individual region is independent of neighboring regions.
Kardar-Parisi-Zhang, or KPZ, processes are more complicated, arising when
growth of an individual region depends on neighboring regions.
A
purely mathematical simulation of an interfacial growth process might look like
a game of Tetris but with single square blocks. These blocks fall at random
into a series of adjacent columns, forming stacks.
In a
Poisson process, since individual regions are independent, a tall stack is just
as likely to be next to a short stack as another tall stack. Taking the top
layers of the stacks as the "surface" of the system, Poisson
processes produce a very rough surface, with large changes in surface height
from one column to the next.
In
contrast, KPZ processes arise when the blocks are "sticky." When
these blocks fall into a column, they don't always fall all the way to the
bottom but can stick to adjacent columns at their highest point. This means
that short columns quickly catch up to their tall neighbors, and the resulting
growth surfaces are smoother. There will be fewer abrupt changes in height from
one column to the next.
"Many
theoretical simulations have demonstrated KPZ processes, a fact which might
lead one to think this process should be ubiquitous in nature," Yunker
said. "However, few experiments have identified signatures of KPZ
processes."
"The
relative paucity of identified KPZ processes in experiments is likely due to
two main factors," Yodh said. "First, a clean experiment is required;
the presence of impurities or particle aggregation can destroy signatures of
growth processes. Second, a substantial amount of data must be collected to
make comparisons to theoretical predictions.
"Thus,
experiments must be very precise and must characterize a wide range of size
scales from the particle diameter to the growth fronts. Moreover, they must be
repeated many times under exactly the same conditions to accumulate
statistically meaningful amounts of homogeneous data."
As in
the previous research, the Penn team's experiment involved drying drops of
water with differently shaped plastic particles under a microscope. The team
measured the growth fronts of particles at the drying edge, especially their
height fluctuations -- the edge's roughness -- over time. When using spherical
particles, they found their deposition at the edges of the drop exhibited a
classic Poisson growth process. As they tried with increasingly elongated
particles, however, the deposition pattern changed.
Slightly
elliptical particles -- spheres stretched by 20 percent -- produced the elusive
KPZ class of growth. Stretching the spheres further, 250 percent out of round,
produced a third growth process known as KPZQ, or Kardar-Parisi-Zhang with
Quenched Disorder. It is also called the "colloidal Matthew effect"
as the surface's growth is proportional to the local particle density so that
particle-rich regions get richer, while particle poor regions stay poor.
In
practical terms, the experiment showed that when spheres and highly stretched
particles are deposited, surface roughness grows at a high rate. However, when
slightly stretched particles are deposited, surface roughness grows at a
relatively slow rate.
The
ability to control surface roughness can be important for industrial and
commercial applications, as non-uniformity in films and coatings can lead to
structural weakness or poor aesthetics. Surface roughness is controlled
passively in the team's experiments, making this process potentially attractive
alternative for more costly or complicated smoothing processes currently in
use.
"Experimental
successes are highly valued in the math community," Borodin said.
"Not only do they demonstrate real-life applicability of very advanced yet
originally purely theoretical research, but they also suggest further
directions and even predict yet undiscovered mathematical phenomena."
The
research was supported by the National Science Foundation through Penn's
Materials Research Science and Engineering Center. Peter Yunker is now a
post-doctoral fellow at Harvard University.
Source: University of Pennsylvania
Leave Your Comments!
Share What’s Going on
in your brain about the Topic. We need Your Response . Feel free to leave comments!
