Put me in, coach! How trained literacy coaches can improve student reading comprehension
Credit:sedl.org |
The language and reading comprehension skills of low-income
upper elementary-school students -- especially English-language learners -- can
improve markedly if trained literacy coaches engage teachers in conducting
interactive text discussions with students, according to a three-year
University of Pittsburgh study. The Pitt researchers report in the journal Learning and Instruction that
language and reading comprehension showed measurable improvement for young
students when their teachers had worked "at-elbow" with
content-specific literacy coaches to foster a more interactive learning
environment during class reading assignments.
In the
study -- one of the first of its kind -- the coaches were trained using a
professional development system designed at Pitt's Institute for Learning
called the Content-Focused Coaching Model® that has coaches provide teachers
with the tools they need to implement rigorous, standards-based lessons.
Teachers can then use the knowledge they've gained to train other teachers in
their schools.
"Our
goal was to create a method for closing the literacy gap between more
privileged and low-income students," said study principal investigator
Lindsay Clare Matsumura, a research scientists in Pitt's Learning Research and
Development Center and an associate professor in Pitt's School of Education.
"We found that a well-structured and content-specific approach to literacy
coaching shows strong evidence of being able to really make an impact on
classroom text discussion and reading achievement in these upper elementary
grades -- a critical time for students to develop their higher-level reading skills."
This
content-specific method, developed at Pitt's Institute for Learning within the
University's Learning Research and Development Center, also lends itself to
adherence of the Common Core State Standards, a national campaign aiming to
increase the quality of the country's education system.
"Changing
discussion patterns in classrooms is a big undertaking," said Donna
DiPrima Bickel, a fellow in Pitt's Institute for Learning and codeveloper and
leader of the Content-Focused Coaching Model®. "The Common Core State
Standards require a broader and deeper level of comprehension from students at
all grade levels beyond first grade. It's imperative that teachers learn ways
of supporting students to interact effectively with a range of different types
of texts. Teachers engaged with coaches trained in the Content-Focused Coaching
Model® valued the support they received in helping them learn to facilitate
text discussion on rigorous texts."
In a
group-randomized trial, Matsumura -- along with Helen Garnier, a consultant
with Pitt's Learning Research and Development Center, and Jessaca Spybrook of
Western Michigan University -- investigated the effects of the Content-Focused
Coaching Model®, zeroing in on the quality of text discussions in the
classroom.
The researchers
worked with 29 schools in a Texas school district that serves a high percentage
of low-income and English-language-learning students. Half of the schools
adopted the Content-Focused Coaching Model®, which entailed highly trained
coaches entering schools and providing professional development training to
upper elementary school teachers. The other half continued in their previously
assigned literacy plan, which included the involvement of literacy coaches
untrained in the coaching model.
"Many
literacy coaches don't receive a lot of training on how to work effectively
with teachers," said Matsumura. "So our goal was to work intensively
with these coaches by teaching them how to model instructional strategies and
work with teachers to better plan reading lessons. We provided them with
effective strategies to share with teachers so they could boost their
engagement with students."
During
the study's first year, Pitt researchers collected baseline data on the quality
of classroom discussions, teachers' participation in professional development,
and students' reading achievement. Soon after, the coaches were placed in
schools and began working with teachers on "Questioning the Author,"
one approach to the Content-Focused Coaching Model® in which students answer
critical questions about the author and text. "Questioning the
Author" was developed at Pitt's Learning Research and Development Center
by Emeritus Professor Isabel Beck and Research Scientist Margaret McKeown.
Under
this literacy approach, students are asked to stop throughout the reading of a
book and answer thought-provoking questions. If a text is written unclearly,
said Matsumura, the teacher will pause to make sure students understand what is
happening and also review any unknown vocabulary. The approach is meant to
result in more interactive discussions leading to better comprehension and
retention, and it entails "quite a bit of planning" on the part of
teachers for it to be effective, Matsumura said.
In the
Pitt study, the coaches began by leading a classroom discussion while teachers
observed. After several months of observation, the teachers adopted the
technique into their classroom for the rest of the study. Students' reading
scores were evaluated through a series of tests throughout the three years.
The
team found that schools participating in the coaching intervention had a
positive effect on students' reading achievement -- specifically for
English-language learners, who made up 40 percent of the study's sample.
English-language learners with trained teachers scored .48 of a standard
deviation higher on the state reading rest than those in the comparison
schools. A standard deviation is the average distance between any score in a
distribution and the mean of the distribution.
"One
of our suppositions is that in having these kinds of interactive discussions,
you're really getting kids to talk and learn to use new vocabulary
actively," said Matsumura. "Nevertheless, our study highlights the
need for usage of literacy-coaching programs -- like the Content-Focused
Coaching Model® -- to promote student reading achievement."
In
addition to improving students' literacy at an individual level, the study had
a larger, across-the-board success.
"Anyone
can provide you with an anecdote about how one coach has helped one teacher but
the real story here is in the systematic results," said Bickel.
"Lindsay and her team retrieved data that clearly show that schools with
coaches trained in the Content-Focused Coaching Model® improved literacy skills
far beyond those where teachers worked with coaches who were not trained in
this method. And, as a result of this study, we are able to better describe the
components of an effective coaching program."
As is
the case with most large-scale projects, widespread implementation of these
interventions may prove to be a challenge. Therefore, Matsumura and her
colleagues are now working towards delivering this coaching online.
Source: University
of Pittsburgh
DON’T
FORGET TO-
Leave Your Comments!
Posted by Unknown
on Saturday, January 26, 2013.
Filed under
Strange Science
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0